Brave New 1984
Bill S-210, Comprehensive Sexuality Education, and why Canadians must not get locked out of the Internet
While much attention of late has been rightly fixed on Bill C-63, the “Online Harms Act”, an equally (if not more) insidious piece of legislation may be slipping under the radar. Bill S-210, a private member’s bill, has the potential of locking Canadians out of the internet altogether.
All in the name of “safety”, of course. Titled “An Act to restrict young persons’ online access to sexually explicit material”, Bill S-210 is crafted, purportedly, to keep Canadian youth safe from pornography on the web. The problems of mixing children with sexualization is rightly recognized by this bill. As for the solutions it proposes, one would be hard pressed to invent anything more deeply dystopian.
In brief, Bill S-210 seeks to make a legal offence of any organization making sexually explicit material available on the Internet to anyone under the age of 18 in Canada. In order to restrict access of minors to such material, the legislation would see age-verification technology, likely including facial recognition, put in place on any site where sexually explicit material could be accessed. Not only would websites face fines between $250K - $500K for failing to put age-verification systems in place, they could end up being blocked in Canada altogether.
According to the bill’s sponsor, independent senator Julie Miville-Dechêne, the legislation would simply bring the same age-verification requirements of real-world vendors of adult content to the digital space. Just like the clerk at the corner store is prohibited by law from selling sexually explicit magazines to minors, so online providers would be responsible for restricting access to pornography. As she told CBC in a 2023 phone interview, "The main goal of this bill is to reproduce in the virtual world what already exists in terms of protecting children from exposure to porn in real life”1.
As critics of S-210 point out, however, the scope of the bill reaches far beyond porn. According to University of Ottawa law professor Michael Geist, “it applies to any site or service that makes sexually explicit materials available. This would presumably include search engines, social media sites such as Twitter, or chat forums such as Reddit, where access to explicit material is not hard to find.” 2
So not only does Bill S-210 envision age-restricting large swaths of the Internet through verification technologies that include facial recognition, it also creates a legal framework whereby the government, through its regulators, can apply for court orders mandating Canadian ISPs to block sites from their subscribers. The far-reaching ramifications this are difficult to fathom. As Matt Hatfield summarized for Open Media:
“If S-210 is passed without major fixes, Canadians could see most Internet services require us to provide a government-issued ID to log on; have our faces repeatedly scanned and stored in leaky databases to simply live our online lives; and see many websites and services that refuse to participate in this draconian system blocked in Canada altogether. Services that aren’t willing to use unsafe age verification methods may try to sanitize their entire network, meaning automatic algorithmic scanning of all our user content, and the posts that flow through them.”3
As Aman Jabbi’s research shows, the globalists’ plan for a permissions-based internet (and world) has been in place for some time now. This is where they’re trying to take us. Not only is S-210 extreme and dystopic, it would also be utterly ineffective since age-verification technologies applying to Canadians could easily be circumvented by the use of Virtual Private Networks (VPNs). Hence, once this kind of legislation is passed in any country, this will be the justification for why it must be implemented in every country (hello global digital ID).
S-210 is a curious little bill. Apart from being outlandishly draconian and thoroughly futile in its purported goals, one of its most noteworthy features is that it is not a government bill. It has actually received very little support from the Liberal party, which is focused on it’s own Online Harms Bill, C-63. Bill S-210 is a private member’s bill; the kind which rarely result in new laws being enacted. And yet, S-210 has passed three Senate readings and two in the House of Commons. While general support for the Liberals is in the toilet, where it belongs, S-210 is backed by the Conservatives, the Bloc Québecois, and the NDP.
In Geist’s view, S-210’s breezing through of the Senate was due to Senators being “reluctant to reject a bill framed as protecting children from online harm”. This may well be true. But how did such a bill come into existence in the first place?
If the Wiki page on bill S-210’s sponsor Julie Miville-Dechêne was underwear, it would be a thong. It outlines in as few words as possible that Miville-Dechêne was appointed to the Senate in 2018. Before that, she worked as a journalist and broadcaster for Radio-Canada, and spent 25 years as a public affairs correspondent for the network. She’s held the position of president of the Conseil du statut de la femme since 2011, and for some reason, served as the representative of Quebec in Canada’s delegation to UNESCO in 2017.4
Clearly, Miville-Dechêne has had a long career in message management and propagation. Her link to UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, is interesting because this is the organization that created the exceptionally creepy Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE) framework.
CSE is defined by UNESCO as “a curriculum-based process of teaching and learning about the cognitive, emotional, physical and social aspects of sexuality” .5 According to the creators of CSE, human beings are sexual from birth, and sex underpins pretty much every aspect of our human lives. Rather than leave us to explore, learn and develop willy-nilly, UNESCO and its partners like the WHO would like to see education around sex standardized and globalized through the adoption of their comprehensive framework by teachers in schools and leaders in extra-curricular and community organizations.
While the language of the UNESCO guidelines are intentionally left somewhat vague to “accommodate regional differences”, the basic framework unwaveringly envisions the initiation of all children into formal sexual education by the age of 5 years old. From there, the CSE structure is to continually introduce children to wider aspects of sexuality year after year in an incremental format.
One of the fundamental objectives of the guidelines is to prepare children for experiences related to sexuality before they encounter any. While the example of introducing girls to the concept of menstruation before the age when they start menstruating is not outlandish, it is also not immediately clear why this would have to be the jurisdiction of UNESCO and the WHO. According to these organizations, of course, parents are not doing an adequate job educating their children around matters of sexual development, and religious institutions only serve such information with large helpings of insurmountable shame.
In addition, UNESCO and the WHO point to the internet as a source of confusing and dangerous information about sexuality for children, who are being exposed to such matters earlier and earlier because of it.
“Countries are increasingly acknowledging the importance of equipping young people with the knowledge and skills to make responsible choices in their lives, particularly in a context where they have greater exposure to sexually explicit material through the Internet and other media. The 2030 Agenda and its global Sustainable Development Goals1 (SDGs) calls for action to leave no one behind, and for the realization of human rights and gender equality for all. The mobilization of political commitment to achieve goals on education, gender equality, health and well-being, also provides an important opportunity to scale up existing or new multisectoral programmes to bring CSE to children and young people everywhere.”6
In the interpretation of the CSE guidelines by the WHO Regional Office for Europe, at least, “equipping young people with knowledge and skills” means teaching 6-9 year-olds about contraception and the “sexual rights of children”, and formal instruction for preschoolers aged 0-4 on early childhood masturbation.7 I would hardly be surprised if future revised editions of the guidelines included school games like “hunt-the-zipper” from Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World.
What qualifies the Educational, Social and Cultural Organization of the UN to act as experts in global sexuality education for children? I am not sure, but it is well documented that the UN specifically has been embroiled in child sexual abuse scandals going back decades. Even the UN’s own 1996 study admitted that in half of the countries where UN peacekeeping troops were sent in to armed conflict areas, their arrival was associated with a rapid rise in child prostitution.8 A 2004 report from Amnesty International disclosed that young girls were being kidnapped, tortured and forced into prostitution in Kosovo and that it was UN and NATO personnel acting as the primary customers driving the demand for sex slaves. In 2017, an investigation by the Associated Press revealed that a group of over 100 UN peacekeepers ran a child sex trafficking ring in Haiti over a period of 10 years, and that no peacekeeper was ever jailed.
Far from being a case of “just a few bad apples”, even an analysis from within the Canadian government concluded that opportunities for the exploitation of children appear to be baked into the organizational structure of the UN:
“Internal Canadian government documents reports dated 2016 suggest that The United Nations has "glaring gaps" in its procedures for tracking and prosecuting peacekeepers accused of exploitation and sexual abuse, and that only a small fraction of cases may be reported. The Toronto Star obtained the memo which reads in part: "Events in (the Central African Republic) and the data coming out of the (Secretary General’s 2016) annual report point to a system that is lacking in efficiency, transparency and coherency." The memo goes on to say: "Part of the answer to these deficiencies lies in establishing enduring, system-wide structures but the nature of UN governance makes this a challenging endeavor. In addition, as we continue to unpack how member states themselves can better approach this issue from pre-deployment training to punishing perpetrators to victims’ assistance, there must also be a greater willingness by individual countries to examine and address internal shortfalls." In 2016, a UN report named 21 countries that had 69 credible reports of incidents in 2015. It documented 69 allegations in 2015 alone. One briefing note obtained by the Star pointed to "unique, structural factors within the UN system" complicated goals of greater transparency and enforcement. "Although military personnel are covered by military codes of conduct and justice systems, UN police and civilian staff accused of [sexual exploitation and abuse] in the field may face only minor disciplinary measures, such as repatriation and being barred from future deployments," the unclassified document reads.”9
So while the internet is so dangerous to the normal sexual development of children that it must be age-gated for humanity, we are simultaneously expected to believe that relinquishing the responsibility of educating our children around sexuality to the WHO and UNESCO would be something other than abandoning them to abusers.
If there was ever any doubt, bill S-210 is not about protecting children; it’s about locking us out of the internet under the pretense of protecting children. Comprehensive Sexuality Education is not about protecting children either, it’s about formalizing the sexualization of children under the pretense of “education”.
Although its entirely possible that senator Miville-Dechêne has nothing but good intentions, the notion that anyone with any power in the Canadian government is actually working to protect children from anything is laughable. Rather, it is the power structure currently in place that facilitates the sexual abuse of children and the psychological abuse of everyone (see Covid-19). UNESCO’s Comprehensive Sexuality Framework could be seen as a formal structure for the grooming of children by pedophiles, with legislation like S-210, brought to us by a senator informed by UNESCO ideology, acting to protect the abusers by controlling our access to information about the ongoing abuse.
In George Orwell’s novel 1984, language was twisted to officially name things according to the exact opposite of what they were. The Ministry of Peace was concerned with war. The “Ministry of Plenty” ensured that everyone stayed starving. The “Ministry of Truth” was where historical records were changed in real-time. The Party’s slogan read: “War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Strength”.
Besides “Orwellian”, another term to describe the turning of things on their head to become their opposite is “satanic inversion”. Satanism is largely misunderstood today, but courageous survivors like Max Lowen have been doing incredible work to shed light on this ideology and why its main practices are based in child sexual abuse. If you are in doubt as to whether or not our world is currently run by satanic pedophiles, I challenge you to watch three or four of the many interviews with SRA survivors on her website (sooner rather than later, while we still have access to the internet).
Far from protecting children against anything, the existing power structure seeks to groom them, normalize paedophilia, marginalize the role of parents, and control the flow of information.
We must not let any of this stand.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/porn-site-age-verification-proposed-bill-1.7060841
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2023/12/the-most-dangerous-canadian-internet-bill-youve-never-heard-of-is-a-step-closer-to-becoming-law/
https://openmedia.org/article/item/whats-wrong-with-bill-s-210-an-openmedia-faq
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julie_Miville-Dech%C3%AAne
https://www.unesco.org/en/health-education/cse
International Technical Guidance on sexuality education, Revised edition, pp.12 https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/reproductive-health/sexual-health/international-technical-guidance-on-sexuality-education.pdf?sfvrsn=10113efc_29&download=true
https://www.bzga-whocc.de/fileadmin/user_upload/BZgA_Standards_English.pdf, pp. 40
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_abuse_by_UN_peacekeepers
ibid
Great piece Lisa. We are not "conspiracy theorists" because we are capable of deductive reasoning, following the evidence and basic pattern recognition.
UNESCO is one of the critical influences in the shunting of the herd in to a transhumanist corral.
I'm sure you've come across this:
UNESCO_-its-purpose-and-its-philosophy-UNESCO-Digital-Library.pdf
https://wrenchinthegears.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/UNESCO_-its-purpose-and-its-philosophy-UNESCO-Digital-Library.pdf
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
“It is, however, essential that eugenics should be brought entirely within the borders of science, for, as already indicated, in the not very remote future the problem of improving the average quality of human beings is likely to become urgent; and this can only be accomplished by applying the findings of a truly scientific eugenics.”
Sir Julian Sorell Huxley
From UNESCO : Its Purpose and Its Philosophy
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
See also this politically motivated hit piece masquerading as robust scientific "research", and notice academic "collaborators" are all funded by UNESCO (apparent on first couple pages)
Le mouvement conspirationniste au Québec (in french of course)
https://www.slideshare.net/dedicaces/le-mouvement-conspirationniste-au-qubec
(best viewed in fullscreen mode)
The Nepharium is so much worse and so much deeper than I ever could have imagined!
I am having a hard time understanding this bill as it stands right now our education system with the implicit O.K. from ALL GOVERNMENT LEVELS is telling our teachers in every school in most Provinces to teach them how nice it is to bugger each other, encourages oral sex between everyone, shows disgusting downright filthy books to even kindergarden classes. The cherry on the cake of course is trying to persuade every child to change sex and to lie to their parents because they can not be trusted.
So please tell me what is on the internet that is any worse than this???